Critical annotated bibliography


Critical annotated bibliography is also called analytical and it is one of the most commonly used annotation styles. It not only summarizes the material, but also incorporates critique and evaluation of the sources. It also examines strengths and weaknesses of each source as well as determines how sources are compared to each other and whether the particular source is important for your own topic. Usually if you are asking yourself who can do my finance homework for me, than chosing a critical style in writing is surely a good point.

The purpose of critical annotated bibliography is to provide the reader with full bibliographic information, give the summary of the content including purpose of the study, methodology and results, and provide critical evaluation of strong and weak points, usefulness for a specific field of study.

It should not only summarize the material, but evaluate the reliability of the information presented, its quality, accuracy, the appropriateness of the methodologies followed, and the credentials of the author, whether he is influential and how competent he is in this field of studying. It also evaluates the conclusions that were made and reflects whether the authors have achieved their aims.

If the given annotated bibliography is only a first step to further thesis, dissertation or any other major research, than it can also evaluate how conclusions made by another authors can be useful in your own project. In this case your own critical reaction to the sources should be indicated.

You may consider how the information from a particular resource approaches the subject in general and assume why. Mention if the scope of the given work is a narrow viewpoint or a broad range. Think if the author was a leading one or an outlier and in that case how was his approach different from another, was it influenced by some theoretical viewpoint, pay attention to any conflicting conclusions. Did the author probably have access to the information that former writers did not have. Think of limitations of the study and any significant omissions that were made. Indicate why have you selected specifically this resource, what makes it stand out and what is its value to your and other related future researches.

Keep in mind that there is no such thing as a totally objective researcher. Each writer has his own point of view and particular angle from which he approaches the topic. It can be some theoretical framework or idea, a rhetorical purpose, a practical belief that one approach is more effective than the other based on the professional experience or some bias that may negatively affect the evaluation of the concrete material.

At least you should always be aware of theoretical viewpoint and perspective of the author. If the book had an editor, his perspective should also be taken to account. Make sure you pay enough attention to your own theoretical viewpoint and perspective and reflect what was the reason for you to start writing critical annotated bibliography.

Make sure you do not forget what was the target auditory for the works you are studying, as well as the auditory for your own research.

Related articles:

1. Style for Annotated Bibliographies
2. What to mention in a critical annotated bibliography
3. What an annotation should include
4. How to Do a Critical Annotated Bibliography

Annotated bibliography introduction
Purpose of annotated bibliography